Friday, 28 October 2011

Rising Decals 72-040 - Zero 零戦 and Airfix Dogfight Double


Continuing something of a Reisen-fest, Rising Decals new 1/72nd sheet for the Zero Fighter contains a selection of 10 interesting schemes, including two which are suitable for the new Airfix kit, three if you don't mind a bit of modification. One is a battered, veteran A6M2 with interesting tail markings from the Phillipines in 1945, there is a Houkoku marked A6M2 from the carrier Shokaku in 1942 and a bomb carrier with wing tanks from the carrier Zuiho in 1944.

What I like about this sheet is that the markings cover the A6M3 and A6M5 as well, so there is something for everyone who wants a representative collection of Zero marks. Whether we will ever see the A6M3 and A6M5 from Airfix is an interesting ponderable but there are now good kits available, from the Fine Molds megastars to the Hasegawa classics and even the Hobby Boss A6M5 is a reasonable kit  - certainly good enough for a bit of painting practice or experimentation.


There are no less than five A6M3 Model 32 in the amber grey scheme, including an aircraft captured, repaired and test flown; the classic Tainan Ku V-187 (with a correctly coloured fuselage band) and three other Houkoku adorned aircraft, one with double red chevrons on the fuselage. The two A6M5 subjects include the Saipan '8-13' and, most interestingly, a very early machine '9-109' from 204 Ku at Rabaul in 1943-44. This one requires a bit of kitbashing, basically adding A6M5 wings to an A6M3 for a very interesting new look, and until Airfix pander to my daydreams Hasegawa is the way to go. Whilst there are ten markings options on the sheet the number of Hinomaru is limited. Included are some Hinomaru with the painted over white borders (see pic). This is another comprehensive and well thought out Japanese subject sheet from Rising that further narrows the gap for Zero markings. Special thanks to Mirik of Rising Decals for the sample sheet.


Hot on the heels of their new mold A6M2 Airfix have also released a Pearl Harbor 'Dogfight Double' containing kits of the new P-40B and Zero together with paints, brush and glue. Obviously aimed at the 70th anniversary of the attack this set seems pricey at £18.99. The single Zero option is for the lead aircraft from Akagi but it would have been good to see a more representative selection of alternative markings for PH Zeros in this special set. The box art invokes the classic "whitish grey" Zero which will just not go away. Airfix again recommend 90 Beige Green to approximate "IJN Light Grey Green" (whatever that is) but (on soapbox) it baffles me why their researchers go with information which is out there but has little evidential merit and ignore scholarly data which has been around since 1996. I think it comes down to a basic determination for Zero colours to be what many people want them to be rather than what they actually were. Would you use 90 to represent even a faded and scale colour RLM 02? Of course not (off soapbox).



There is also a starter set featuring the Zero kit alone with paint, brush and glue for £7.99. The markings option seems to be the same as in the 'Dogfight Double' but the box art image on the Airfix website appears to be of an unfinished version (see below). The art on both sets is excellent but would have looked even better with better visualised colour on the Zero.



Image credits: Decal sheets © 2011 Rising Decals; Box art and schematics © 2011 Hornby Hobbies Ltd

Wednesday, 26 October 2011

Painting The Early Zero-Sen - PDF e-guide

"

To coincide with the release of the Airfix 1/72nd scale Mitsubishi A6M2 Zero kit I have produced an e-guide in PDF 'Painting the Early Zero-Sen' which will be available on a limited basis. It contains a run down and comparison of all relevant hobby paints which have been measured and tested. 28 pages, 6,000 words, with two colour photos and 53  sRGB rendered colour chips. See side panel for ordering details.

Sections are as follows:-

Introduction
Personal Interpretation and Choice
Imagery and Paints Circa 1970-1996
The Historical Evidence
Hobby Paint Colours
Painting the Details
Conclusion
Sample Pages


What they have said about it:-

" . . . a belated thank you for the guide which I have found an excellent and very informative read."

" . . . your article is superb-I think my OTB project may be the Tamiya 1/32 A6M2!"

" I cannot remember if I told you so, but the Zero paint guide is excellent."

"I appreciate the work you've put into this, it's some really good analysis."

"Thank you for the Zero painting guide.  Lots of great information."

"It was exactly what I'd expected and solved many of the lingering questions that I'd had for quite a while (since 1996 I think!)."


"Great stuff. I can see a lot of work here. Congratulations on a great effort. I'm looking forward to the other titles on the website."

"I love the format. This is going to be so useful for anyone who wants to paint an early Zero accurately!"

" . . . this is AMAZING stuff. Wow what a feast for Zero fans! I am most impressed at the way you have laid this out very comprehensive and very complete. A one stop shop for all your paint needs for the early Zeros. My congratulations!" 

" . . . thank YOU for all that great work! The material is perfect, extremely useful."

"Congratulations on a job well done with your early Zero paint guide. Very informative and I now have a much clearer idea on the exterior finish to apply to my 32nd A6M2."

"Great job with the painting guide for the early Zeros."

"Hi Nick - an excellent piece of work, congratulations."

"Your approach of recreating the original paints and then experimenting with the aging process is probably the closest that we can get to the actual colour at this time. Recognizing that paint has such variables should temper much of the over-specific concentration on one colour as the only correct one."

"Painting the Early Zero-Sen is a very well thought out document, It will be very useful to have in regards to figure out appropriate Japanese colors for profiles and models."

" This is really great!  Now, if you would write one up for the early Kate and Val!"

"What a fantastic Job! Well done. Now I have no excuses to go wrong."   

"I have only looked at the first two pages, and it seems a great piece of work- you must have put a lot of time and effort into it."

"Thanks for sending me the pdf...it's just great."




Image credits: PDF cover and sample pages © 2011 "Straggler"

Friday, 21 October 2011

Stop Press! New Mold Airfix Zero Released!


Some sprue pics here.

And an in-box review here.



Image credits: Photograph © All-Japan Model Show 2011; Painting guide © 2011 Hornby Hobbies Ltd

Thursday, 29 September 2011

Exploding Fuel Tanks by Richard L. Dunn


There is no shortage of myths circulating about the Pacific War or on the subject of Japanese aircraft flown during that war. Whilst the rise of the internet has contributed to the dissemination of arcane factual information to a much wider audience the concomitant rise of the internet forum has contributed to the dissemination of myths, half-truths and misperceptions, more often than not motivated by the best intentions. Despite this there are still many 'black holes' of knowledge where we might grope and speculate but which remain essentially hidden from us by time and chance.

Filling a knowledge gap and shining a light into one of those black holes, Richard L. Dunn has tackled the crucial subject of aircraft fuel tank protection in his new book 'Exploding Fuel Tanks'. This book tells the story of the air war over the Pacific in World War Two from the perspective of aircraft vulnerability. The result is surprising history with many oft repeated but inaccurate characterisations of the combatants debunked. In addition to a story about technology it sheds new light on combat operations and the actual losses (not just the claims) each side suffered. The main chapter titles in the book are:-

I. State of the Art – 1940
II. The Experience of War: 1940-1941
III. Opening Rounds of the Pacific War
IV. Case Study: Midway
V. Shifting Balance: mid-1942 to early-1943
VI. Progress and Problems for the Japanese
VII. Tactical Consequences – 1943
VIII. Air Combat Late 1943 – Early 1944
IX. Reckoning
X. Lessons from the Final Months
XI. Course and Consequence – It Made a Difference


The book can be obtained via Amazon or direct from Richard's own website which includes reviews, a sample chapter to read and examples of the lllustrations and photographs. Richard's meticulous approach to research and writing has been previously evidenced in several excellent articles on the subject of Japanese aviation at j-aircraft.com.

Image credit: Cover art © 2011 Richard L. Dunn

Monday, 26 September 2011

Airfix Aichi D3A1 Val Rides Again!

Airfix will be re-releasing their venerable Aichi D3A1 as a special edition to coincide with the 70th Anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor. In addition to the well known 'BI-231' of Lt Cdr Takeshige Egusa offered in the last release of the kit decals are now included for presentation aircraft # 522 'AII-256' from the carrier Kaga at the time of the attack. Good choices both. The old 'AI-201' of the original kit appears to be no more, has ceased to be . . .


Egusa's aircraft is captioned as for the Pearl Harbor attack but it is doubtful that the dark green camouflage paint was worn at that time and this scheme is more usually associated with the later Indian Ocean operation. Captain Agar described the Japanese dive-bombers attacking HMS Dorsetshire on 5th April 1942 as "painted green with red wingtips". And Cdr (Ag) John Fair's report on the sinking of HMS Cornwall during the same action described the dive-bombers as "Camouflaged 'Deep Sea' with diagonal red band just before the tail" presumably meaning a deep sea green in colour.

Painting suggestions are for Humbrol 90 Matt Beige Green to represent "IJN Light Grey Green" (sic) which is the same paint Airfix recommend to represent RAF Sky - not really representative of the olive grey colour. I continue to be amazed at the imparting of duff information - even by people who ought to know better - when researchers have been sharing their findings for more than a decade. For a more representative appearance using Humbrol paints consider adding a little Matt 225 Middle Stone to Gloss 40 Pale Grey which is already a "warm" grey of beautiful consistency and finish. This will achieve a good looking semi-matt finish.  For the Dark Green Humbrol 75 Matt Bronze Green is recommended. This is not bad but lacks a little in green chroma. I'll be looking at IJN Green paints in more detail as part of the Raiden series and will tackle Humbrol mixes then. No concession is made to the blue-black of the cowling, which like RAF Night, was a mix of ultramarine and carbon black pigments rather than a pure black.


This 1964 kit was mentioned fondly here and what modeller John Wong managed to achieve with it is shown here.


Image credit: All © 2011 'Airfix' a trademark of Hornby Hobbies Limited

Friday, 23 September 2011

Ohka Kits & Colours

Fine Molds have recently released two 1/48th scale kits of the IJN 'Ohka' (桜花 cherry blossom) rocket propelled and piloted bomb, the MXY7 used for special attacks, usually dropped from a Mitsubishi G4M2 'Betty' bomber, and the K1 unpowered glider trainer. There have been previous kits  from Hawk (as 'Japanese Kamikaze Piloted "Baka" Bomb' and in a double kit with a German V1) and Tsukuda (a Hawk re-pop) said to be to 1/41 scale and Kora have released or are due to release a model of the later Ohka Model 22 in 1/48. A 1/72nd scale Ohka was included in the Hasegawa Mitsubishi G4M1 'Betty' bomber issued in 1969.


Tsukuda Ohka

A photo-etch sheet designed to be used with the new kit is also available separately from Fine Molds (!). At that price you might think . . . . It consists mainly of seat, seat belts, armour plate and other cockpit fittings together with a brass pitot tube.


The US authorities coined the Japanese term 'Baka' (馬鹿 fool or folly) to describe this weapon, said to be for propaganda reasons in order to downplay their concern at the Japanese suicide tactics. It always irks when  contemporary terrorist attacks are sometimes compared to the Japanese suicide attacks by ignorant (or lazy) media writers. The Japanese made those attacks as uniformed combatants, flying military aircraft against legitimate military targets in a theatre of war. This is not to forget or in any way to denigrate the many victims of the attacks, who were also soldiers, sailors and airmen fighting for their countries and doing their duty. And it is not to excuse or justify the war aims of the government that sanctioned them. The final writings of the special attack pilots reveal that many of them, far from fitting the popular stereotype of fanatics, expressed anxiety, sadness at the prospect of their premature deaths, concern for their families, an instinctive awareness of the ultimate futility of the enterprise but above all a deep sense of unavoidable duty. The peer and hierarchical pressure in their decisions to volunteer for these terrible missions are not to be underestimated. The young Japanese pilots who volunteered were servicemen responding to a rigidly imposed hierarchical militarism in which the concept of sacrificial death in battle and duty to their homeland was central. The Imperial Rescript to Soldiers and Sailors (軍人勅諭 Gunjin Chokuyu) issued by the Emperor Meiji in 1882 contained the precept that "Duty is heavier than a mountain; death is lighter than a feather".


I suppose it is possible to build a model of an Ohka and give no thought to the underlying moral and philosophical aspects, the distinction between an aircraft carrying a bomb and an aircraft designed as a bomb is perhaps a fine one, but for some it may be more difficult. Fine Molds have already released models of the "human torpedo" kaiten  - (回天 - difficult to translate "shaking the heavens") and midget submarines used for one way missions so the Ohka could be seen as a logical continuation of this theme. Ohka has a special resonance for me because at about the age of seven I sat in the cockpit of one overseen by my father who pointed out the sparse controls and how they worked. It was the origin of my interest in Japanese aircraft but the concept was, and remains, a chilling one.

TAIC Cutaway Drawing of Ohka

Hawk "Terror Attackers" Double Kit of Ohka and V1


Ohka Model 11 Colours

Leaving aside the difficult moral and philosophical dimension to focus on modelling this aircraft there is the perennial question of colours. Ohka is often depicted in the whiteish grey associated anachronistically with the early Zero or sometimes in a light green as with Hawk's kit. The Fine Molds kit instructions suggest overall GSI Creos (Gunze) Mr Color # 35 IJN Grey (Mitsubishi), which is a bright, slightly blueish grey of Munsell 4.7 B 6.5/0.5 (close to FS 36373 @ 1.26), conceived in the 1980's and purporting to represent the early Zero colour. However, a pale blue-green around Munsell 2.5 G 8/1 and 5 G 8/1 has been authoritatively reported from extant samples for the fabric covered plywood wings and tail assembly. The fuselage and metal parts are reported to have been painted in an "olive grey" (amber grey or yellow grey) around Munsell 5 Y 6/2 to 7.5 Y 6/2 similar to the early Zero. Some colour photographs and film (view from 1:09) do suggest that this is not simply due to thermal ageing of the paint surface although no doubt that might be a factor in the current appearance. The main reason for the yellowish caste of the "grey paint for light metal" is subject to much heated debate. The presence of yellow or yellowish-brown pigments in the paint is disputed but regardless of that the Urushi-type plant resins of amber character used in the binder had an immediate tinting effect on the white pigment and with the black created a fugitive greenish undertone. The fabric dope was of a different type, a pigmented cellulose acetate butyrate, the xharacteristics of which are that it is  clear rather than amber in tone and that it does not readily yellow with age.  


The colours shown above are those as reported in the linked article but it is perhaps best not to follow them too slavishly as the contrast between wings, tail and fuselage might be stark on a small 1/48th scale model. A more subtle difference between a cool, slightly blue-green grey and a warm, slightly yellowish grey will work better visually. A superb 1/72nd scale Hasegawa Ohka, displayed here demonstrates this more subtle effect. The two Munsell values cited for the metal paint are very close to each other @ 1.81 so the difference need not worry but there is no close FS 595B equivalent to this colour. The closest,  FS 33303 @ 3.26 & 4.98 respectively, is a poor match, being too brown in appearance and without the slight green or olive caste that is present. The closest FS 595B value to both blueish grey fabric paint values is 35622 @ 1.65 and 2.08 respectively, so a good match. Coincidentally this is the same FS value that is closest to the Du Pont MAP equivalent paint standard 71-021 Sky Type S Grey - a pale duck egg blue applied as an equivalent to Sky on early US manufactured aircraft exported to the RAF.


But by all means experiment and if you prefer an all-grey Ohka so be it. In terms of approximating the colours on a model Japanese modellers always seem more comfortable with the concept of absorbing the available data and settling on a personal interpretation of it - and accepting the inevitable differences between models without fretting over them or trying to impose their preferred solution on others. Western modellers on the other hand, appear more inclined to seek a "consensus" - that old impostor which can sometimes become the origin of a modelling convention that is flawed rather than factual. Too often the well is poisoned by "innocent" questions prefaced in the expectation of a "controversy" and/or containing their own half-arsed answers which leaves this pragmatist cold. Bearing in mind the arcane subject matter the bold and unequivocal statements sometimes made about colour on forums, as though Japanese (and other) aircraft were really painted in Tamiya or Gunze hobby paints, never cease to amaze - especially those gems that begin with "I don't know but . . . ".


Internally Robert C Mikesh reports evidence of yellow-green 'aotake' in the cockpit interiors of the three examples in the UK*, but bear in mind this appearance could be a shift from an original brighter blue-green or malachite. The seats, seat mount, canopy latch fittings, brace handholds and other steel  components were painted black, but the instrument panel was also 'aotake'. Note that this interior colour for the Model 11 is in contrast to the darker green opaque paint reported for the Ohka Model 22 in the same source and in Asahi Journal Vol.3 No.1 'Japanese Aircraft Colours at NASM'.


None of the ready made 'aotake' hobby paints achieve a really convincing appearance, often glaring out at the observer as modern metallic paint, and it  is better, if you have the patience, to mix the colour and apply it as a semi-translucent varnish over a bare metal finish as demonstrated here and also shown here. Scale and shadow does come into this though so the "gleaming" appearance of a 1950's Japanese robot on a small model is best avoided. For Humbrol users approximate 50/50 combinations of 88 Deck Green and 104 Oxford Blue, lightened slightly with 109 WWI Blue can be used to represent both the Army # 3 interior indigo grey and generic 'aotake', thinned as appropriate.

Note in this view the apparent similarity of fuselage, wing and tail colours

* Reported in 'Japanese Aircraft Interiors 1940-1945' (Monogram Publications, 2000)

Image credits: box art © 2011 Fine Molds; box art © 1958 & 1960 Hawk & © circa 1980 Tsukuda ; model images © 2011 Fine Molds; TAIC drawing net; film stills author's collection; rendered colour chips © 2011 Straggler; colour photos net.